To run this test I used command 'iperf3 -c 192.168.11.93 -t 30 -P 5' on the client side. This time I used iperf3 between linux and windows machines, both connected with ethernet cables. Option path '/usr/share/miniupnpd/firewall.include' If you think anything else would be helpful let me know. No, CPU is not maxed out neither when using wireguard or openconnect. Is there something I can do to make Wireguard faster? Can’t wait to hear your opinions. Ping: 30ms, Download: 14.8 Mbps, Upload: 5.37 Mbps Ping: 38ms, Download: 14.9 Mbps, Upload: 4.95 Mbps

Ping: 30ms, Download: 14.5 Mbps, Upload: 4.29 Mbps Ping: 33ms, Download: 14.8 Mbps, Upload: 3.83 Mbps Ping: 35ms, Download: 14.93 Mbps, Upload: 3.67 Mbps Ping: 22ms, Download: 70.9 Mbps, Upload: 6.23 Mbps

Ping: 22ms, Download: 57.5 Mbps, Upload: 4.63 Mbps Ping: 16ms, Download: 55.0 Mbps, Upload: 6.65 Mbps Ping: 24ms, Download: 57.1 Mbps, Upload: 6.75 Mbps Ping: 32ms, Download: 55.5 Mbps, Upload: 4.2 Mbps I performed my measurements using Ookla speed test app on Android device connected via VPN through LTE network. So now I wonder, if perhaps I did something wrong in configuration? Anyway, router is connected to a link speed of 100/10. However, based on the speed tests I did so far, Wireguard performes much worse compared to OpenConnect. So I thought I would use Wireguard when I’m near home and OpenConnect when I visit China. Basically I decided to do this because from what I read, Wireguard is “Crème de la crème” when it comes to VPN speed performance and OpenConnect is quite successful when it comes to passing through the great firewall of China.

I installed both, ocserv and wireguard packages on my router.

Improve cisco anyconnect vpn speed